Author Archive

How your web browsing may be hurting the web

how-your-web-browsing-may-be-hurting-the-web

I’m going to let you all in on a little secret: the web can be a sleazy place. Well, maybe that’s not a secret, but I’m not talking about 2 girls and their cup of questionable content, or Nigerian businessmen that have an incredible offer to get rich if you send them $100.00; I’m referring to the day-to-day web you and I use every day.

The web can be a wondrous source of information and entertainment, often all rolled up into one eye-popping image – enter the infographic. You may not recognize the word, but I’m sure you’ve seen them: images containing all sorts of interesting facts about something, laid out in an interesting way and full of pictures and charts to make the numbers fun. Check out this neato infographic about water:

Wow a chart with quotable items about bottled water - must click!

(Click image for full view)

Simple. Easy to read. Full of fun facts that you can pass along to coworkers. What you’re probably not thinking is that this image’s sole purpose is to manipulate the web and destroy all that is good in this world (May be a slight exaggeration). How is it doing this? By manipulating SEO – search engine optimization.

The goal of most revenue-generating websites is to bring in site traffic; whether the site makes money from ads, links, or selling things online, they depend on traffic, and most sites rely on Google to get it. You type in a keyword on Google, and all sorts of relevant sites full of useful information pop up in the search results – or at least that’s what you think happens.  In reality, sites with no useful information that often do nothing other than link to other sites often dominate your search results. These sites know they offer nothing of substance and manipulate SEO to get high rankings in search results. One of the ways that they do this is by using infographics.

In a perfect world (wide web) the best sites would come up in Google searches. They’d reach the top of the list by having quality content that users find relevant and useful. In the real world, garbage site jig the system to try and get you to visit their awful, useless sites like this one:

This site is pure garbage.

If you were to search for the term “Online Education” this site may well appear in your search results. But don’t be fooled, this site offers no real content; its sole reason for existence is to get you to click on the links to other sites. This is how they make their money. Essentially it is just an extra step between Google and where you want to be, designed to make money off your searches. Google spends a fair bit of time working to prevent this, as it’s in their best interest to make Google searches as useful as possible; however, many people are employed full time to find ways to beat Google too. Each time Google closes a vulnerability,  it’s only a matter of time before someone figures out a new loop hole.

But how does this relate to Infographics?

Check out where the water infographic comes from:

Online education dot net. The infographic is hosted by the same crappy site that has absolutely nothing to do with water – so why would they post this? The reason is that if enough people view the infographic, if enough people share and repost it, if they do this enough times with enough infographics, eventually their site will start appearing in your Google search results, even though it offers absolutely no value to you. I’m not going to explain how that is done in this post, but be assured that when you are viewing this infographic – you are supporting pure evil!

Of course, not all infographics are link-bait, and many are put out by quality sites that do offer useful content. What I’m referring to is sites with no relevant content that create infographics for the sole purpose of driving traffic to their garbage websites to manipulate SEO.

So what does this mean for you as an online advertiser?

It means that your site is fighting for online presence with other sites using nefarious practices to gain an unfair advantage. It means that your great site, full of relevant content, may rank lower than a garbage affiliate site. It means that you may need to turn to paid Adwords to get a front page presence, and end up paying more than you should to get the attention your site deserves. (We can help with that ;) )

This problem is not just limited to infographics, and it’s more widespread than you may think. Many popular bloggers and websites are paid to embed links in their posts, or re-post infographics. To get as sense of how nefarious and widespread this problem really is, I suggest reading this post by a person who made a living doing what I’ve described:  http://www.reddit.com/r/IAmA/comments/d7e24/my_job_was_to_game_digg_using_infographics_voting/

The more you know.

NSFW

nsfw

Rolling Stone True Blood CoverYesterday, the web was lit up with the new cover of Rolling Stone magazine, feature 3 very naked cast members of the HBO hit show  “True Blood”.  Accompanying this provocative image was the usual battle over whether such an image should be considered NSFW (not suitable for work).  Many people would say that they (or their HR dept.) would find this image unsuitable to be displayed on a screen at work.

Yet the same image can be found displayed publically in almost any newsstand selling the magazine, so why would the same image that can be displayed in public be inappropriate online? Is there a double standard for what can be viewed online and what can be viewed in public?

Consider the Dove ads that have appeared on many billboards: (more nudity after the jump) Read more

From around the web

from-around-the-web

Web Trends:

If your online habits are anything like mine, you probably see a lot of Best Buy ads. Next to West Jet, they are the ads that I seem to be served the most.  (This is why I never clear my cookies – they ensure I see more ads relevant to my interests) A few days ago I saw this ad from Best Buy:

What is interesting here (other from the departure from the Blue and Yellow colour scheme) is that they are clearly trying to pick up on the recent popularity of sites like Groupon and Living Social, which focus on daily specials. Best Buy is well know for its constant special promotions, and  the only real change here is that their creative department has taken notice of a new trend and tried to capitalize on it. I’m actually pretty impressed to see such a large company tailoring a campaign to an emerging trend.

Internet taxation:

A new bill has emerged in the US, pushing for a tax on items bought online. This is worth paying attention to, as this could directly affect you if you buy or sell items online from the US ( anyone use Ebay, Amazon or iTunes store?)

http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2367551,00.asp

Digg this.. if you can

digg-this-if-you-can

Several days ago, the breaking news on Digg.com was the discovery of a network of conservatives that had been collaborating to control the content that reached the front page of the large social news aggregator. http://www.slideshare.net/mzkagan/what-the-fk-is-social-media-now-4747637

This is a significant find as Digg sneaks into the list of top 50 largest websites in the US at number 50. The site serves as a social aggregator, gathering news and entertainment articles from around the web and allowing users to vote up articles, creating a system where users determine which articles reach the front page and get national attention. Reaching the front page can lead to a huge surge in site traffic, often crashing the website from the volume of visitors. Digg is an example of social media where the masses determine what information and entertainment should gain exposure.

I myself use Digg almost daily as my primary source for what’s trending on the web.

What is significant here is that a relatively small group of people were able to manipulate the information being received by millions of people. This group understood how Digg works, and were able to use this to push their personal interests. Unethical? Yes. But it’s a powerful example of how understanding social media can be used to affect it.

Digg articles have comment sections that show that most topics are constant battlegrounds between supporters and opponents of many things, including products (take Mac vs. PC for example). It would now seem that a determined group could essentially control the message that millions of people are receiving regarding a number of products or services. What if Toyota had buried all mention of a recall while pushing forward their own message targeting other car makers? Could Apple have controlled the spread of their iPhone 4 antenna problem? It would certainly be a huge undertaking, but then again, how much time and effort did these companies spend trying to manage the message? If nothing else, this small group of conservatives has shown that it is possible to at least make a dent in the information being passed around the web every day.

Advertising is (not) Creepy?

advertising-is-not-creepy

IAB_ad

The IAB has released a great site that focuses on the issue of online privacy. As I mentioned in a previous post, the general public needs a better understanding of how online advertising works, especially since so much of the free content available online is made possible because of ads. Its great to see that Kathryn and I aren’t the only ones who think this is a issue that needs more attention.

Not only has the IAB launched this site, but they’ve also developed some great creative ads that I hope they make available for general distribution.

if the IAB allows it, I would encourage all websites to run these ads. Educating people about online advertising will improve the industry for all advertisers and providers.

Check out the Privacy Matters site at www.iab.net/privacymatters.

View the Privacy Matter ads here

Quality vs Quantity?

quality-vs-quantity

Quality Site Vs. Page count.

If you have spend any amount of time surfing sites like Digg or Reddit you will know that lists, particularly Top 10s, are very popular for attracting visitors to a website. A writer at Cracked.com even referred to it as the golden formula in a list of writing techniques for Cracked writers.

I love lists too, but some websites have taken a sinister turn with this technique in order to increase their page count for site visitors. While many sites will list the 10 items on a single page or two, other nefarious sites break up each item on the list into its own page, turning a single article into ten pages. But what’s wrong with that? (Aside from the annoyance of waiting for 10 pages to load just to read through a single article).

Read more

Mixx Roadshow

As Kathryn has discussed, the 2009 Mixx Roadshow was full of interesting, relevant and regional presentations, each outlining innovative and successful campaigns. However, what impressed me the most this year was the IAB’s segues between each presentation. When compiled together, these bits of information created an overview of online advertising that I found extremely relevant and practical on any scale. While many of the presentations offered great ideas on grand scales; the information that the IAB presented can be used by all online advertisers regardless of budget.

Read more

Embedding disabled by request

Anyone that has watched more than 3 YouTube videos has likely come across the dreaded ‘embedding disabled’ screen when they try to view a video on a 3rd party site (a site other than YouTube). One of the great social attributes of YouTube is that anyone can repost a video to another site; whether it be a another website or a Facebook profile, YouTube videos can easily make their way around the internet.  Video sharing is a great social tool – so why would anyone want to prevent it?

There are two simple reasons for this: Read more