Archive for the ‘ The Internet ’ Category

How your web browsing may be hurting the web

how-your-web-browsing-may-be-hurting-the-web

I’m going to let you all in on a little secret: the web can be a sleazy place. Well, maybe that’s not a secret, but I’m not talking about 2 girls and their cup of questionable content, or Nigerian businessmen that have an incredible offer to get rich if you send them $100.00; I’m referring to the day-to-day web you and I use every day.

The web can be a wondrous source of information and entertainment, often all rolled up into one eye-popping image – enter the infographic. You may not recognize the word, but I’m sure you’ve seen them: images containing all sorts of interesting facts about something, laid out in an interesting way and full of pictures and charts to make the numbers fun. Check out this neato infographic about water:

Wow a chart with quotable items about bottled water - must click!

(Click image for full view)

Simple. Easy to read. Full of fun facts that you can pass along to coworkers. What you’re probably not thinking is that this image’s sole purpose is to manipulate the web and destroy all that is good in this world (May be a slight exaggeration). How is it doing this? By manipulating SEO – search engine optimization.

The goal of most revenue-generating websites is to bring in site traffic; whether the site makes money from ads, links, or selling things online, they depend on traffic, and most sites rely on Google to get it. You type in a keyword on Google, and all sorts of relevant sites full of useful information pop up in the search results – or at least that’s what you think happens.  In reality, sites with no useful information that often do nothing other than link to other sites often dominate your search results. These sites know they offer nothing of substance and manipulate SEO to get high rankings in search results. One of the ways that they do this is by using infographics.

In a perfect world (wide web) the best sites would come up in Google searches. They’d reach the top of the list by having quality content that users find relevant and useful. In the real world, garbage site jig the system to try and get you to visit their awful, useless sites like this one:

This site is pure garbage.

If you were to search for the term “Online Education” this site may well appear in your search results. But don’t be fooled, this site offers no real content; its sole reason for existence is to get you to click on the links to other sites. This is how they make their money. Essentially it is just an extra step between Google and where you want to be, designed to make money off your searches. Google spends a fair bit of time working to prevent this, as it’s in their best interest to make Google searches as useful as possible; however, many people are employed full time to find ways to beat Google too. Each time Google closes a vulnerability,  it’s only a matter of time before someone figures out a new loop hole.

But how does this relate to Infographics?

Check out where the water infographic comes from:

Online education dot net. The infographic is hosted by the same crappy site that has absolutely nothing to do with water – so why would they post this? The reason is that if enough people view the infographic, if enough people share and repost it, if they do this enough times with enough infographics, eventually their site will start appearing in your Google search results, even though it offers absolutely no value to you. I’m not going to explain how that is done in this post, but be assured that when you are viewing this infographic – you are supporting pure evil!

Of course, not all infographics are link-bait, and many are put out by quality sites that do offer useful content. What I’m referring to is sites with no relevant content that create infographics for the sole purpose of driving traffic to their garbage websites to manipulate SEO.

So what does this mean for you as an online advertiser?

It means that your site is fighting for online presence with other sites using nefarious practices to gain an unfair advantage. It means that your great site, full of relevant content, may rank lower than a garbage affiliate site. It means that you may need to turn to paid Adwords to get a front page presence, and end up paying more than you should to get the attention your site deserves. (We can help with that ;) )

This problem is not just limited to infographics, and it’s more widespread than you may think. Many popular bloggers and websites are paid to embed links in their posts, or re-post infographics. To get as sense of how nefarious and widespread this problem really is, I suggest reading this post by a person who made a living doing what I’ve described:  http://www.reddit.com/r/IAmA/comments/d7e24/my_job_was_to_game_digg_using_infographics_voting/

The more you know.

Monday’s Axillaries

Here is a list of post-weekend items that your DSA Online team found interesting:

From Kathryn:

It’s been a busy week for me. As I absorb as many articles as possible about location based gaming (for a forth coming article – STAY TUNED!), most of my links this week on on Foursquare and mobile apps.

From Shannon:

BWA HA HA HA: Digg User rebellion

From Charissa:

The future of e-readers? Exciting if it actually happens!
http://dvice.com/archives/2010/08/lg-plans-super.php

From Jacquie:

I TEST YOU:

What does this mean for online video viewing?

EDIT: Just added From Charissa:
A little late… but super cool! Arcade Fire & Google collaboration. It’s interactive browsers! Works best in Chrome.

Monday’s Axillaries

Here is a list of post-weekend items that your DSA Online team found interesting:

From Kathryn:

This is a cool top 10 (well 13) list to start off my Monday. It Business Canada presents: Technology’s 13 biggest myths: http://www.itbusiness.ca/it/client/en/cdn/News.asp?id=58878

From Alexander:

I found the point on DVR time shifting interesting, as it possibly affects when TV spots should run for time sensitive creative.

http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/hr/content_display/news/e3i0aa95b30b2cefc02861899eb056602ba

From Shannon:

I think it will be interesting to see how this unfolds.

http://www.techradar.com/news/internet/foursquare-responds-to-facebook-places-threat-711373?src=rss&attr=all

From Jacquie:

Google’s Android has a dirty little secret about Telecom companies regaining their power….

http://blogs.techrepublic.com.com/hiner/?p=5855

From Charissa:

A fun and interesting article on privacy in social media.. Something everyone should be thinking about with Facebook Places coming soon to Canada.  It also references back to one of my favorite movies, Enemy of the State!

http://www.hexkey.co.uk/lee/log/2010/08/22/phonecall/

NSFW

nsfw

Rolling Stone True Blood CoverYesterday, the web was lit up with the new cover of Rolling Stone magazine, feature 3 very naked cast members of the HBO hit show  “True Blood”.  Accompanying this provocative image was the usual battle over whether such an image should be considered NSFW (not suitable for work).  Many people would say that they (or their HR dept.) would find this image unsuitable to be displayed on a screen at work.

Yet the same image can be found displayed publically in almost any newsstand selling the magazine, so why would the same image that can be displayed in public be inappropriate online? Is there a double standard for what can be viewed online and what can be viewed in public?

Consider the Dove ads that have appeared on many billboards: (more nudity after the jump) Read more

Monday’s Axillaries

Here is a list of post-weekend items that your DSA Online team found interesting:

From Shannon:

I like the one about the Kid receiving 26000 texts after justin Bieber tweeted his phone number: http://mashable.com/2010/08/16/justin-bieber-phone-number/

From Alexander:

Rolling stone magazine taking a shot at Record companies for fighting file-sharing (aka progress) : http://www.icanhasinternets.com/2010/08/a-big-fat-thanks-to-record-execs/

From Kathryn:

More updates about the recent CRTC talks: http://www.cbc.ca/technology/story/2010/08/10/crtc-basic-telecommunications-services.html?ref=rss
Rise in mobile coupon use (thanks Groupon): http://www.marketingmag.ca/english/news/media/article.jsp?content=20100812_150417_5728
An excellent article on why taking a traditional print model to sell advertising is unlikely to work (from my husband :) ): http://radar.oreilly.com/2010/08/how-to-fix-online-advertising.html
This is just the kind of article I want to read over my morning tea: http://ca.news.yahoo.com/s/capress/100815/national/greener_cities

Kathryn decided to write a little song about a recent trend in the land of digital advertising. Play it off Kathryn:

Digg this.. if you can

digg-this-if-you-can

Several days ago, the breaking news on Digg.com was the discovery of a network of conservatives that had been collaborating to control the content that reached the front page of the large social news aggregator. http://www.slideshare.net/mzkagan/what-the-fk-is-social-media-now-4747637

This is a significant find as Digg sneaks into the list of top 50 largest websites in the US at number 50. The site serves as a social aggregator, gathering news and entertainment articles from around the web and allowing users to vote up articles, creating a system where users determine which articles reach the front page and get national attention. Reaching the front page can lead to a huge surge in site traffic, often crashing the website from the volume of visitors. Digg is an example of social media where the masses determine what information and entertainment should gain exposure.

I myself use Digg almost daily as my primary source for what’s trending on the web.

What is significant here is that a relatively small group of people were able to manipulate the information being received by millions of people. This group understood how Digg works, and were able to use this to push their personal interests. Unethical? Yes. But it’s a powerful example of how understanding social media can be used to affect it.

Digg articles have comment sections that show that most topics are constant battlegrounds between supporters and opponents of many things, including products (take Mac vs. PC for example). It would now seem that a determined group could essentially control the message that millions of people are receiving regarding a number of products or services. What if Toyota had buried all mention of a recall while pushing forward their own message targeting other car makers? Could Apple have controlled the spread of their iPhone 4 antenna problem? It would certainly be a huge undertaking, but then again, how much time and effort did these companies spend trying to manage the message? If nothing else, this small group of conservatives has shown that it is possible to at least make a dent in the information being passed around the web every day.

Monday’s Axillaries

Here is a list of post-weekend items that your DSA Online team found interesting:

From Kathryn:

From Shannon:

From Alexander:

The Big Kahuna!

What do you think the top ranked television program has been in the last 12 months the Vancouver market? Survivor? Super Bowl? Surprisingly (or not so surprisingly) it was the Opening Ceremonies to the Olympics on CTV. Both ratings and audience numbers are 50% higher than the program coming in second (which is the Super Bowl).

While this blog is not really about tv, I don’t have the final numbers on how many people were tuned in on CTVOlympics.ca to see the beginning of the Opening Ceremonies, but given the tv audience, combined with the Social site following, I’m going to guess that it was among their highest traffic days for sure.   CTV.ca saw a jump of 27% and while we won’t have access to the CTVOlympics.ca stats until after the olympics, I’ll post up once I have them.  I guess I should ad that the online feed went down before the flame was lit, but the potential for a huge audience was definitely there. The Twitter and Facebook followers for the CTV Olympic groups are both over 17,000 and growing daily.

Political opinions aside, I’m sure proud to be Canadian!